RandoViewers Week 2 Results
A slightly more muted result this week
Once again, my team of Remote Viewers came through with great data. Notably, this week’s results were aligned in very strange ways. Almost everyone very clearly saw the target but they also, almost all of them, note the presence of water when no water is visible in the photo. I also pulled no sneaky business this time around, delivering the coordinates to my Viewers as they were delivered to me.
If you want to go back to last week’s results and have your mind blown, you can do so below:
The intention: VEIL
I’ve noticed in the past that my general state of mind often has an effect on the overall Randonautica experience. In my very first trip out with the app, I kept the intention TREASURE in mind but walked out to the coordinates while listening to the band Mortician, one of death metal’s most brutal acts and the trip had a very sinister and unpleasant cast to it, taking me past the spot where the murdered body of an old friend of mine was found before dumping me on the center of a frozen pond where some sort of bird, likely a chicken, seemed to have been lured and then killed by a predator. It was a very strange experience that seemed colored by my state of mind. Much in the same way that LSD experiences are affected by set and setting, my Randonautica consciousness experiment at that time was dragged to a really grimy and fucked up place by the influence of grimy and fucked up music.
This time around I wonder if my hurried state had an effect on the target coordinates since the word that a noun generator gave me to me was the word VEIL, something that’s hard to articulate in Randonautica terms. What could the intention of VEIL have possibly brought to me and did this muddy intention have an effect on my viewer’s visions of the target location?
The coordinates: 42.980671, -70.933158
Here’s the actual target. How the word VEIL coincides with this location is anybody’s guess but as you’ll see, most of my Viewers had no problem seeing it in their mind’s eye. I also picked up a few new Viewers this week, so things are really heating up over here!
Viewer #1
Viewer #1 definitely saw the spot and I think that if I were there with them, as they were dictating their vision and writing their notes down, I probably could have drawn some more pointed, specific imagery out of them. Comparing their notes to the location image you can see that they spotted the windows, remarking that something was clear or reflective. There’s notes about a curved shape, the circular driveway around the flag. They flag is even mentioned in what is probably the session’s most remarkable detail. The handwriting can be hard to read so they sent a transcription to me and also remarked on shapes that could have been a car and that the location is flanked by something rough, in this case the forested area around the building.
Not bad Viewer #1. You noted that you had low confidence on these reads but you nailed it!
Viewer #2
Viewer #2’s data came in shortly after #1’s came in and their data reflected that of #1’s in a way that I found very surprising. This is the second note regarding the presence of water.
Something very interesting is noted in Jim Schnabel’s book The Remote Viewers. SRI Viewers had a tendency to see through time in very weird ways. They would often see the target location but would sometimes see it in different times. They would describe geographical items that weren’t at the target at the time they viewed it but were either in the past or their data would turn up at the location in the future. The United States was building a new Embassy building in Moscow in the mid-80’s and SRI viewers were tasked with finding bug devices that the building crews were building into the location. Several of the Viewers saw the location as other Viewers did, but where the others remarked that the Embassy was there, many of them saw a vacant space. The vacant space data was scrapped but several years following the RV sessions on this Embassy location, the project to build a new Embassy was scuttled and what had been constructed up to that point was bulldozed, leaving the property a vacant space for years to come.
I’m wondering if my RVs are seeing something that used to be there or if there might be an underground sound of water running through this location. We do have numerous underground rivers in the area. Viewer #2 also notes curves and circles and an upright something that in their notes they insist is a cross. Once again, they caught impressions of the flag which, given the current status of state fanatics in this country is a religious icon to many.
Viewer #2 also points out something in their email that I thought was funny. They mentioned that skeptics could poke holes in this by noting that the viewers could have just google mapped the coordinates and looked at what’s there, but the maps data for this location is out of date. Google maps showed a vacant lot from before the building was built.
Viewer #3
The location definitely isn’t a civic area but it is a modern building with more glass than your average building and it’s location is tucked away at the end of a dead-end street off of a busy road that heads to downtown Exeter, New Hampshire. It’s definitely not a high building and it’s built from light-colored materials. There’s also parking and a round focal point. And once again, there’s a note about water there. I really need to look into the geological history of this location. Their drawing also has what appears to be a garage door or an overhead door of some sort, which the main ground-floor windows of the building actually are! Also, it notes the presence of trees, which is hard to get away from on the New Hampshire seacoast.
Viewer #4
Viewer #4’s note is a little obtuse but I think they were definitely keyed into certain details of the location. There’s no mention of water but the circular nature of the driveway is likely reflected in the presence of wheels on these notes. They draw a bicycle leaned up against a brick wall but the color of the brick is never specified which leads me to think that the brick nature of the wall is meaningless apart from it simply being a wall. There’s also a window on the wall, which is a prominent feature of the building at the location and the bicycle itself isn’t so much specific as a bike as it is a wheeled vehicle of some sort, which is definitely present at the location. There is also a presence of overgrown vegetation at the location.
Viewer #5
Viewer #5 deliberately tried to remove themselves from analyzing the data as the wrote it down and their notes reflect this in a way that I think is really great. Once again, we see the circles, we see a building, we see something tall with a bulb at the end of it, like our flagpole. Viewer #5 notes the presence of the colors red and white but they saw them like a Fly Agaric mushroom. There’s a shape like some stairs. This is also the second time one of the Viewers has noted the presence of a pyramid or a pylon, which makes me wonder what I’m missing in that detail. If two Viewers are noting it, then there may be something to it.
Viewer #5 notes something about a fringed circle. You can see it in their drawing next to the pole with the bulb at the top. Taking a look at the target location, the circle which has the flag in it is fringed by ragged overgrowth a border of loose stone. Their notes also remark on the mingling of natural landscape and artificial and I think that the target location represents this well. Natural woodland was cut out relatively recently to make room for this very boring building, whatever it is.
Viewer #6
Viewer #6 really fucks me up with yet another mention of water. I really need to get to the bottom of this. The rest of their notes are consistent with the location and the data returned by others. They saw trees, something circular in a central position. They also saw a structure that they describe as a cross, in this case a crucifix. The second occurrence of this motif is very interesting to me. The real structure is a flag pole with an American flag on it. They saw a building in a clearing and there it is in the location photo! This week’s results are really blowing my mind.
Viewer #7
Viewer #7 is, like, the sixth viewer to note the presence of water but also some details noted in one viewers notes. “People move through but don’t stop”, “nearby road”, and “active but not busy” describe the area perfectly. The target location is at the end of a short road which branches off of a major throughway that leads to Exeter. It sees a good deal of traffic but not a shitload. We’ve also got notes of a structure at the end of a road, a path, and circular shapes consistent with the locations.
Conclusion
Some Viewers did better than others, but some viewers also improved greatly over their last results. I had to dig through some of the notes to find consistent data but all of them hooked into something about this place that allowed them to see it in part or in whole. With a growing base of users, all delivering results to at least some degree I find myself agreeing with The SRI’s hypothesis that all people are capable of doing this.
The presence of water in almost everyone’s notes was extremely interesting and upon reviewing aerial photos of the location, I noticed that the Exeter Reservoir is right nearby. It’s not close enough to be a landmark on the target location, but there could be an aquifer or underground river below the target.
Upon reflection of the word VEIL, I suppose that what I’ve done is intentionally directed the Viewers toward something concealed. A veil hides things and they’re seeing through the veil to find something involving water.
My Viewers are the shit. Next week’s experiment throws a bit of a curveball. It’s going to be a very interesting chapter in this story.
Def a gov building